Quality, Speed, and Collaboration in Agile vs. Traditional Models
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper compares the impact of Agile and traditional software development models (such as Waterfall and V-Model) on key project outcomes: quality, speed, and team collaboration. Through a comprehensive review of literature and case studies, we explore how Agile’s iterative approach and continuous feedback contribute to higher software quality, faster delivery times, and improved team communication. In contrast, traditional models, with their structured phases and fixed timelines, are analyzed in terms of their strengths in ensuring thorough documentation and upfront planning. The findings provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to optimize their development processes and choose the most suitable methodology based on project needs and team dynamics.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.